It appears about peer review of funding process. As I read on, I find it tranquilizingly analytical, like quiet but vibrant water flowing down and around stones and rocks. The book carries undercurrents that permeate beyond, while correlate closely with suggested topic areas. Insights derived from fair observations with steady patience are most enriching.
Once she lays out, most you may say “Oh, it is obvious. Oh, I know that”. The seemingly plain texting and texture of the narrations suggest deep, not necessarily hard-nose or so-called tough, thinking. The book also emits warm, coil twists that probably only a female author could render.